tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-216118232183086630.post7810035187165165472..comments2023-09-26T06:21:33.525-07:00Comments on 7 'oops 7: Here we go againAJSwtlkhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/10927070658835473340noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-216118232183086630.post-80627683986156774182009-07-15T14:09:47.761-07:002009-07-15T14:09:47.761-07:00I guess we got our answer. Boeing is cutting the p...I guess we got our answer. Boeing is cutting the program. <br /><br />http://blog.seattlepi.com/aerospace/archives/173713.asp<br /><br />What we ought to know is that all information will be funneled through PR, except that leaked to such as the flightblogger.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-216118232183086630.post-72273410053555928422009-06-25T17:36:04.014-07:002009-06-25T17:36:04.014-07:00Here are some more issues to look at:
-- where is...Here are some more issues to look at:<br /><br />-- where is the Board? Asleep at the wheel? They are definitely culpable. Do they understand their responsibilities? Gosh, are they a bunch of in-bred idiots handpicked by Harry? <br /><br />-- this is definitely not your fathers' plane. How can a plane designed on paper (okay, computer paper) be considered airworthy enough to finalize the production process to build the thing? There should have been prototypes built, preferably in house. <br /><br />-- how can Boeing expect that they can outsource responsibility (the Board allowed this?) and get something by other than magic? Sounds like Boeing outsourced its reputation too. That is too bad since very good people work for Boeing. <br /><br />-- why does the Board allow Scott C and Jim M to stay around? Their fork-tongued selves are becoming very problematic (making Boeing's BadDreamLiner a joke).Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com