So, congratulations are in order on several fronts.
As said, the test results agreed with the analytic predictions. That is good and an example of the modern way (we know just how much thought, effort, and evaluation went into the massive analytic framework supported by computing); yet, there is an open question that we'll continue to bring up as to when a model is sufficient to be considered data.
An earlier post, in this blog, mentioned a site that will contain information about 787 technical milestones which appeals to those who want to see details for themselves. Too, the post discussed the problems in financial engineering of having any semblance of empiricism beyond the questionable metric of who has more money.
Expect more of a focus in the future, backed up technically.
Remarks:
01/19/2011 -- Update1 and Update2. The focus now will be mostly the idiots of economics/finance.
No comments:
Post a Comment